🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a rising group of states are considering similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our kids' innocence". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked the legislature to approve a bill raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a related step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding motion demanding a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A strong age limit is a useful starting point," said the European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "based on conclusive data".

Last year, support built behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to design tools that are appropriate and fit for minors," said a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, regulation is largely happening at the local government level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law capping under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws mandating parental consent for minors to open social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from some individuals to copy the Australian lead, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Apart from these regions, other states are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations adopt a more measured position. Unicef has advised that social media bans carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

As this global debate continues, the actions of this nation and others indicate that states globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.