🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on sending state troops in the Oregon city, following a recent legal decision.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on this week that it would rehear the case concerning the executive power with an expanded group of eleven justices. The judicial body also vacated a previous decision from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the federal government.

Legal Saga Over Military Presence

This order represents the latest turn in a long-running legal battle over whether the administration has the legal right and justification to deploy national guard forces in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in uncertainty since the end of September when the deployment effort was initiated in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has argued that federal officials at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while local authorities maintain that municipal police have command of the circumstances.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as a conflict zone, locals have been sharing footage of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and planning activities such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in the city issued two legal injunctions this period – one blocking the federalization of the state troops, and another stopping the use of any national guard troops in the state, after attempts to circumvent the initial injunction by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting command of state troops – but the second ruling stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under consideration simultaneously – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This ruling demonstrates that the truth matters and that the judicial system are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution limits the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot dispatch the armed forces into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, values, and autonomy as this case moves forward and our fight continues in the courts.”